A closer look at the Wrights reveals that their
sojourn in Earl Shilton endured for approximately one hundred years, from
about the middle of the nineteenth century to the middle of the twentieth.
A period during which three generations were born and bred there, ensuring
the continuity of the male line, and a time during which William Wright in
particular, or more precisely his immediate descendants, left their
respective families to branch out laterally.
To clarify these three generations were headed by
William (1814-1897), Charles (1862-1952) and Charles William (1887-1970).
Thomas coming before them, and being the originator in the district, and
John Trevor (Jack), being the last of the line, born there and departing
later to end the five generations’ time in and around Earl Shilton.
Many of these other lateral descendants, from
William’s daughters, extend now to third and fourth cousins still residing
locally, and yet largely unrecognised to each other under their many
differing names, the male line, however, is now extinct in Earl Shilton.
One of these branches, although still using the Wright name, actually
emanates from an illegitimate birth to one of William's daughters,
therefore, as they are using her maiden name that family cannot be classed
as a continuation of the male line. Perhaps this might seem chauvinistic
by today's standards but it is still considered a correct assessment by
genealogical conventions.
Although William Wright was baptised in the parish
church in 1814, he only took up residence about 1850; the male line then
lived in various locations in Earl Shilton until 1946. It was John Trevor
Wright who then left the area to resume his married life, after
interruption by the war, and later nurture the next generation in Boston,
Lincolnshire.
Between 1828 and 1872 there was one other Wright
family living in Earl Shilton, although after a little research it could
be shown that there was only a tentative connection between it and the
family of the main investigations. This other Wright family, headed by
another William Wright who became established by 1851 as a farmer of 220
acres in Church Street, had connections to the Wileman, Hobill and Oldacre
families through marriages. However, they also seem to have become extinct
in Earl Shilton after 1872 and yet again their family continues in
collateral lines under other names. Correspondence with a descendant of
this line now living as a third generation immigrant in New Zealand, was
recently established, indicating another interest in the life and times of
the Wright family.
The first recorded evidence of the Wrights in the
district was in 1810 when Thomas Wright, William's father, married the
widow Alice Harrison, on 11th March 1810 in the parish church at Kirkby
Mallory, subsequently settled in Normanton Turville and started a family
there. Marriage in Earl Shilton before 1854 was not possible, as the
church, dedicated then to St Peter, was only a chapelry of the parish
church of Kirkby Mallory. Baptisms and burials had, however, been
conducted there since the buildings dedication and certainly since parish
records commenced in the 1520's.
The parish church was largely rebuilt in 1855 and
rededicated to St Simon and St Jude, following Earl Shilton's
reconstitution as a parish separate from Kirkby Mallory in 1854, by an
order of the Queen in council. Records of a church, existing on the
present site, and the adjoining castle extend back well beyond the
appearance of the Wright family however, at least as far as the Domesday
survey when the Normans assessed that ‘Sceltone’ was worth 70 shillings
and had the benefit of a priest.
Thomas and Alice's first-born daughter Ann was
baptised on 5th August 1810 at the Parish Church in Earl Shilton. The rest
of their children followed suit over the next few years until their last,
George, was baptised in Thurlaston, as by then, in 1831, when Thomas would
have been about fifty and Alice somewhat older, the nearer church at
Thurlaston would probably have been more convenient. During this period,
the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, it was usual to have
children baptised at the earliest opportunity, as child mortality was
quite high. In common with others the Wrights followed this tradition,
allowing us now to estimate birth dates fairly accurately and prove the
point that little, in family affairs, has changed over the years. Thomas
and Alice’s daughter baptised in August of the year in which they were
married, in the previous March, leaves us to speculate on their activities
and reasons for their union. Although Thomas never actually lived in Earl
Shilton, it was he who had moved into the locality from the small hamlet
of Burton Lazars near Melton Mowbray, sometime between 1790 and 1810. He
had settled in Normanton Turville to establish what, after a short period
while he was a farm labourer, developed into a family business of Higglers
and Carters. Incidentally, Burton Lazars was also the birth place of
William Wright the farmer referred to earlier, and although the
probability that he was a distant cousin of Thomas is strong, further
research is necessary to prove the blood ties.
It is not clear why Thomas settled in Normanton
Turville. The large estate, attached to Normanton Hall, may have provided
work for the Agricultural Labourer, and later the need for transportation
of produce may have offered more work and an income. This estate, founded
by the first of the Turvilles - one of William the Conqueror's Nobles -
had, like many similar country land-holdings, been in decline for some
time when Thomas settled in the area with his wife Alice.
By 1861 there was no trace of the Wrights at
Normanton Turville and the steady decline of the hamlet continued until it
became completely defunct by the 1900's. The estate and the Hall in
particular, however, survived in various levels of ruination until the
building was finally demolished in the middle 1920's. The building,
presently used as a dwelling, is in fact the converted remains of a small
chapel originally built for the Roman Catholics by the Worswicks in 1875.
It is more likely that the move by Thomas Wright was prompted by the
generally improved prosperity of the villages and hamlets in the area,
where the cottage based hosiery industry, relying on the hand-frame
knitters, was booming. The strict controls and heavy financial demands of
the London based Framework Knitters Company drove manufacturers to the
Midlands and especially to Leicestershire where the local breed of sheep
grew wool most suitable for worsted spinning and knitting.
The revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars raging abroad
made labour scarce and the demand very high for hosiery, including many
types of garments, socks, stockings, shirts, cravats and gloves. The need
to service these outworkers was also evident and must have presented
opportunities to the Wrights as Carters. Also, at that period, a number of
smaller landowners and farmers operated hand-frames, and thereby combined
the two lifestyles of farming and hosiery manufacture in the countryside.
Although William Iliffe had begun manufacturing hosiery in Hinckley on a
large scale, sometime after 1640 following the arrival of the first
knitting frame, generally the trade was still rooted in the villages. For
a time hand-frame knitting was so successful it became the county’s only
industry employing whole families from the youngest – hosiers started work
at about 12 when they could reach the foot pedals of the frame – to the
oldest. This village based industry giving the need for the finished
products to be collected and transported to the larger traders and
wholesalers.
Victory at Waterloo in 1815 signalled a deep economic
depression as soldiers returned to swell the labour force and demand for
the hosiery products slumped. A Parliamentary Commission on the state of
the framework knitters, published in 1845, showed that shortly after the
war with France, a weeks wage had fallen from 14 to 7 shillings, and this
was only the beginning. The decline of the cottage-based industry
accelerated as steam and gas powered hosiery factories began to develop,
adding further to the depression. As the 'hungry forties' expired, Earl
Shilton was perhaps a little fortunate, as boot and shoe manufacture now
developed at a pace in the area. Thomas Crick, who had manufacturing
premises in Leicester, and had established himself as a leading
industrialist, handed out work to the decaying framework villages. Earl
Shilton and Barwell being amongst the first to benefit. The method of
production, known as the 'basket-work system', where the uppers were cut
and closed in the factory and the making of the shoe - the attachment of
the soles to the uppers - was completed in small workshops and attics in
the villages, would again require the services of carters to transport the
goods to and fro.
Thomas and his sons, Thomas and John, had thus firmly
established themselves as carters by the 1840's and 50's, having dropped
the claim to be higglers for whatever reason. Could it be that 'higgling'
or 'haggling' carried the stigma sometimes attached to tinkers and other
traders that bartered their goods? A higgler was variously compared to a
peddler, huckster, hawker or even a costermonger. It is now difficult,
however, to clearly identify any specific commodity that they may have
dealt in and carting was becoming more clearly recognised as a trade with
prospects as the need to transport goods was mounting.
But what of William? Although his brothers Thomas and
John had joined their father's trade there was no sign of William during
his teenage or twenties in Earl Shilton, but in 1847, when he was about 37
years old, his first child, daughter Elizabeth, was born in Stretton,
Warwickshire. It seems he took to other pastures and started a family of
his own in Warwickshire. After extensive searching no record of his
marriage between 1838 and 1852 can be found, either in local records or at
the General Registry, London, however, he had returned to Earl Shilton by
1851 and set up home with his 'wife' Ann and daughter Elizabeth in Lower
Church Street. William's brother, Thomas, died in 1860 and as his father
had died sometime earlier. William was now free to take up the old family
business of higglers. Since by 1861 his family had grown to four daughters
and a son, not including Elizabeth who had also died a few years earlier,
now needed support. A return to higgling by William prompts some
speculation - why did he go to Warwickshire and why was he the odd one out
not involved in the carting? Was there some family rift or simply a normal
desire to find a partner and produce a family of his own? On his return to
Earl Shilton, between 1845 and 1851, unlike his siblings he had already
started this family. Brother Thomas for instance was still at home with
his parents and continued so for at least another ten years, beyond the
age of thirty. A clue to another possibility is in William's residence at
the 'Marl Pit' in 1861, extraction of the valuable clay like material
known as 'marl', commonly used as a calcium rich fertiliser during the
nineteenth century, would contribute to the family upkeep by generating
wares for the higgling trade. The site, incidentally, is still known as
'Marl Pit Farm' and the large depression, in the surrounding land, records
the evidence of these earlier extractions.
During the 1850's, despite much poverty that still
existed and the spectre of the soup kitchen, set up to assist the
destitute, the people of Earl Shilton generously contributed to the
appeals made by the church for funds to maintain the church fabric and
establish day-schools. These day-schools were intended for weekday
education of the village children, as opposed to the already established
Sunday schools. With funds raised by subscription and a parliamentary
grant the Earl Shilton school was built in 1858, a comparatively large
building with room for 200 children costing £1,050. Following on from the
rebuilding of the church in 1855 at a cost of £3,500 it is obvious the
appeals for contributions at this very difficult time were exceptionally
well supported. Some of William's offspring took advantage of the new
school, Louisa and Charles both being scholars in the 1860's and 70's,
while their elder sisters were employed in local stocking factories, which
had managed to survive the slump and, incidentally, continued production
well into the twentieth century. During the nineteenth century the term
‘scholar’ has to be treated with some caution as it could refer to anyone
aged below one to the then ‘full’ age of twenty-one. It is known in the
family, however, that Charles and his siblings did attend day-school
periodically at this time.
As the close of the nineteenth century drew nearer
the old basket-work system died out. Largely influenced by the National
Union of Boot and Shoe Operatives, founded locally in 1874, as the members
pushed for better conditions in the engine powered factories and an end to
the often exploited and cheap laboured outwork system. New inventions and
powered machinery, as adopted by the manufacturers in Leicester, further
fuelled the move to the factory manufacturing system and by 1896 there
were twelve independent boot and shoe employers in Earl Shilton, in what
was fast becoming the centre of the footwear industry.
For whatever reason, William returned to general
labouring towards the end of his life, which finally came in December 1897
and thus left his son, Charles, to continue the line, as his uncles had
remained bachelors and as far as is known had no issue. Following his
early education at the church schools, Charles entered the boot and shoe
factories as a shoe finisher, where he remained for most of his working
life. The Wright family, like the vast majority of those living in the
eighteenth century, was devoted to following their religious convictions
according to the rites of the established Church of England. At some
period, either while Charles was a child or possibly later during his
adulthood - his wife Julia could have been party to the decision - they
were converted to following a branch of the dissenters, known as the
Independents. In 1669 Archbishop Sheldon ordered an inquiry into the
number of dissent groups in Leicestershire and, although during the early
years of these churches it is difficult to make any clear distinction
between them, the Earl Shilton group was listed as being Presbyterian.
However, they considered themselves to be 'Independents' and followers of
the doctrines of Robert Browne whereby they, the members, governed
themselves. Although dissent in Earl Shilton reaches back as early as
1651, when the Baptists - probably developed from the earlier group of the
1640's at Broughton Astley - first started to hold their secret meetings
in private houses, by 1831 there were 430 Independents, four times the
number of Baptists. This popularity may have accounted for the Wrights'
choice and conversion. Having been established in 1810 with only five
members and a meeting place of a barn in Wood Street, the Independents
membership had doubled by the end of the first year and had continued to
rise at a rate that demanded a dedicated meeting house. Therefore, due
mainly to the generous endowments of a Mr Isaac Basford, in 1824 the
Independents' present church building was erected. At a total cost of
£1,400, with 500 ’sittings’, a Sunday school building was also provided,
but it is not evident whether the Wrights took the provision of reading
and writing, together with religious instruction into account, or possibly
the installation of an organ in the 1860's may have been a factor of
persuasion.
Charles' children, however, 'enjoyed' both Sunday
school at the Independent chapel and day-school at the church school
gaining a basic education in the arts of reading and writing, together
with instruction in the dissenters’ approach to religion. Although by now,
in the middle of the nineteenth century, nonconformist views and doctrines
were accepted, establishment in the previous century had been more
difficult. Occasionally some recording of nonconformist's family affairs
was made in the parish registers along with the majority of the
parishioners. Some of the clergy, however, were still unable to mask their
distaste for dissent, as shown by the rector of Blaston. For example, on
the 15th May 1719 when he recorded that "Jane daughter of Samuel Porter &
Jane his wife (two damned and Damnable Barngoers) was Baptised (the father
sayth) by one David Soames, a Presbyterian, ergo having no more Lawful
Authority to baptize than a chimney sweeper".
The dissenters meeting houses, or churches as they
are now called, still survive in Earl Shilton with the one exception of
the Primitive Methodists’ building, which was demolished in the 1970’s.
Although the remaining church buildings are occasionally restored the old
Sunday school rooms in all cases have been replaced with modern function
rooms which still serve the general community. Play-schools, dancing
classes, concerts, exhibitions and bazaars are common activities, together
with the traditional Sunday functions and weekday meetings of the
different church memberships.
Charles Wright married Julia Middleton on 12th April,
1887 in the parish church of Market Bosworth and, in due course, their
family extended to two sons and four daughters, born between November 1887
and January 1903. Again, like the previous generation, only one son,
Charles William, had issue to maintain the male line and also, like
previous generations, some of his daughters had issue ultimately to
develop into more lateral lines. These other lines, like the earlier
descendants of the numerous female branches, are documented elsewhere and
offer other stories. How did Charles meet Julia, born and bred in Market
Bosworth? This is the sort of question that could be asked of all
generations with the answers lost in the past. Despite travel
restrictions of these bygone ages, some movement obviously took place.
Although by Charles' time, the rough tracks of earlier dates had, in a
number of cases, become turnpike roads, supposedly maintained by the
Turnpike Trusts, travel to and from the villages must have been difficult
by modern standards.
No doubt if the Wrights, who took to carting, could
tell us now, tales of poor journeys on terrible roads ending in arguments
with the Turnpike Toll Keepers would proliferate. The north and the south
entries into Earl Shilton were both guarded in the eighteenth and early
nineteenth centuries by Tollgates on the main through route from
Birmingham to Leicester. The locals, probably including the Wrights, would
have known of many roundabout routes to avoid paying their dues at these
gates. So now, as the nineteenth century drew to a close, Charles and
Julia's family grew and would have been found about the time of the Great
War as occupiers of a general 'corner shop' grocery store in Station Road.
Station Road, incidentally, was only completed, and known as such, in the
latter half of the 19th century, as the Nuneaton and Leicester Railway
completed its line to Leicester and a station at Elmesthorpe prompted the
extension of the road southward. This extension was begun in 1862-3 and
sponsored by the Earl of Lovelace, as one attempt to relieve the
destitution brought about by the cotton famine.
Lovelace, whose family, the Noels of Kirkby Mallory,
had owned estates which included property at Elmesthorpe, Kirkby Mallory,
Peckleton and Earl Shilton for generations, with their family home being
Kirkby Mallory Hall (razed in the 1950's).
Unlike the prosperity generated locally by the
Napoleonic wars, the American Civil War, begun in 1861, had severe
repercussions in England and in Earl Shilton in particular as the blockade
of the southern ports prevented the export of cotton. More than 1,200
people were out of work in Earl Shilton at the time and workers on the
road received some relief in the form of payments of meat and bread. The
road was completed just after the time of Charles Wright's birth and
subsequently became another important route in and out of Earl Shilton
from the junction with the more ancient track that served the Breach and
Huit farms. It was still unmetalled at the turn of the century, however,
despite much used by traffic serving the local gas works, built in Station
Road, and the transportation of coal, from the station at Elmesthorpe, for
the local coal merchants. The demise of the Wrights' carting, towards the
late 1860's could probably in part be attributed to the proximity of the
fast growing Midland Railway system.
The family’s first abode was in the same terrace of
small 'two up - two down' dwellings as the shop, still with outside
privies at the end of the garden and drinking water wells in the shared
yards. The author clearly remembers the peculiar and distinctive taste of
water, drawn via the old hand pump, from ‘grand-mar’s’ well. The living
conditions that prevailed during this period must have generated many
difficulties, especially after moving into the grocery store. With the
shop taking up the 'front' room and six children using the only other one;
and later, as the elder children matured and left home, the arrival and
consequent nurturing, of an illegitimate grandchild, to be tragically
killed in a motorcycling accident when aged eighteen, bringing further
domestic disharmony. In fact, that remained their style of home for their
life’s extent, with gradual improvements made by the introduction of mains
drinking water, gas, electricity, sewers and water flush lavatories. At
the beginning of the 1920’s, after the war, Charles and Julia moved next
door to the shop to see out their declining years and their family
progress through the next generations. Although the early Wrights in Earl
Shilton saw the great changes from the agricultural nature of the
locality, into the beginnings of the present industrial state, it was the
twentieth century Wrights of Charles and Julia's family who saw the modern
technological developments from the first motorised vehicles and
electricity to television and the moon landings.
Similar to some previous generations Charles and
Julia were succeeded by more that one son, only one of which, Charles
William, gave issue to continue the Wright line. Harry, their second son
and third child, raised a small family but was without a son of his own
and in fact was childless. His family actually consisted of his wife,
Connie, and her daughter by another relationship. As in most families the
Wrights, of a number of generations, had their share of illegitimacies and
non-blood heirs. A narrative record of family relationships tends to be
somewhat confusing when reference to individual family members is made,
therefore consulting a family tree or chart can sometimes be helpful,
although those generated from a computerised database, like those shown on
other pages, usually will not include these non-blood relatives.
It has been through Charles and Julia’s second
daughter Ellen’s extensive knowledge and memory that much of the detail of
her thirty one cousins, and their families in Earl Shilton, has been
recorded, and detailed in these trees with other collaterals. In small
village communities like Earl Shilton younger children can often associate
and play together unaware of their kinship. Research shows that by the mid
1990’s the author had knowledge of over one hundred and thirty blood
descendants of William and Ann with over ninety percent, of those still
living, still residing locally within the Earl Shilton area. More recently
in the late 1990’s two of William Wright’s descendants became close
friends at high school without knowing their relationship of fourth
cousins once removed.
Charles William Wright Charles' first born, married
Ada Pickering on 9th April 1912 at the Parish church in Earl Shilton. Like
his father, following an education at the church day-schools and the
Independents' Sunday school, entered the local boot and shoe industry,
where he remained for his working life, as a shoe pressman. Also like his
parents, Charles and Ada’s first home was in one of the same small ‘two up
- two down’ dwellings in Station Road, after a short initial period living
in a small terrace in Hinckley Road. Charles and Ada’s family extended
between 1914 and 1918 to three children, two sons and a daughter. Yet
again only one of these sons, John Trevor the youngest, gave issue to
continue the line; in the event nearly 15 years after he had left Earl
Shilton and had entered his fifth decade.
Social activities had been available in Earl Shilton
since Mediaeval times, when the rights for Shiltonians to hold fairs in
the last week of October was established, later these fairs became known
as the 'Wakes'. In common with other villages, the traditional Inns had
been replaced with the more common ‘Public House’ of the nineteenth
century. There were 9 or 10 ‘Pubs’ in 1850, including some like the 'Horse
and Trumpet', the 'Walnut Tree' and the 'Duke of Wellington' now long
forgotten. It was Charles William however who became the first of the
Wright family to be personally involved and committed to these newer and
expanding social activities. In part it was the factory environment, with
its more controlled working hours, that had some influence on the
development of leisure time activities in the area. Although Charles
William’s father had been known to have taken part in ice skating, on the
Ashby Canal at Hinckley, during the severe winters of 1914-17, and his
brother Harry in roller skating at the local indoor skating rink, it was
Charles William who took a part time job as Manager of a Social Club at
Earl Shilton. He was appointed Manager of the Social Institute in March
1926, at a salary of ‘15 shillings cash per week plus house rent, electric
lighting and coal for own use’. Charles and Ada then remained at the
Institute with their family until 1943, when they moved to their final
home of a more up to date detached house in the newer part of Station
Road. The author recalls, during the wartime of the early 1940’s, calling
at the Institute for Sunday lunch after a morning at the Independents’
Sunday school, by then the ‘Congregationalists’. Vivid memories remain of
Aunt Ada’s ‘Yorkshire Puddings’ and enjoying listening to radio broadcasts
of ‘Itma’ and other popular and morale boosting programmes. There had been
a number of football and cricket teams represented in Earl Shilton before
but the ‘Stute’, as the Social Institute became popularly known, was a
general men’s club which incorporated many different groupings and
sporting activities. The Social Institute was an innovative centre for
male sporting and leisure time activities, partly aiming to bring a
temperance influence on the young men and boys of the village, and
partially to provide a social meeting place for the general population,
outside of the established church and chapels. The club minute books
record many instances of the organisation of whist drives, dances and
garden parties by the Management committee usually supported by their
wives as ‘volunteer’ caterers. The Wright family members also recall how
‘grandma’ Wright, Charles William’s mother, and aunt Ada, his wife, spent
many hours cooking for large numbers of guests in the Concert Room during
feast time holidays and at Christmas time. Quite a task since the cooked
food had then to be carried from the house kitchen, at one end of the
building, to the Concert Room on the first floor at the other end. During
the larger gatherings the turkeys, paltry, rabbits etc. were cooked at one
of the local bakeries. The major task then was to transport the cooked
food the half mile or so back to the Institute. This was often done by the
baker himself laying out the meal on his handcart, loosely covered by
towels, and assisted by some of the more able guests. Cooking and serving
of food was still somewhat primitive then, compared with to-day’s
standards, but family recollections recall many grand feasts and social
occasions.
Another memory of the author’s is of the times spent
‘helping’ uncle Charlie maintain the billiard tables and stoking the
ancient, coke fired, boiler that supplied the hot water central heating
system of the main building. Replacement of this old and inefficient
system was one of the first tasks undertaken by the Management Committee,
which included the author, in the late 1970’s.
Over the years the ‘Stute’ became a focal point for
many generations of fathers and sons. During the 1940’s and 50’s the
author recalls the usual practice of congregating there with
contemporaries, to play a frame of snooker or a hand of cards, before
moving on to the local Palace Cinema to view a favourite 'Western' or
'Serial Thriller'. Local worthies and industrialists had founded the
Institute, at the end of the nineteenth century, and it could itself
become the subject of a separate history. Yet there were many connections
between it and the future descendants of Charles and Julia, both in
participation of the many sporting activities - Charles William's sons
playing billiards at national competitive level - the social activities as
indicated above, and the general management during the 1930's and the
1980's. Also a unique family occasion was celebrated there in April 1937
on the coincidence of Charles and Ada's Silver Wedding and their
respective parents’ dual Golden Weddings. A great family occasion well
reported in the local press, with the attendance of over one hundred
family members and friends, from the Wright and Pickering families.
Following Ada’s entry into the family the Wright’s family tree in Earl
Shilton became more complex as her husband Charles William already had
Pickering cousins through an earlier marriage into this other extensive
Earl Shilton family. It was on the 4th September 1918 when John Trevor was
born, the third child of Charles William and Ada, who ultimately became
the last of the male line in Earl Shilton. Following a primary education
locally, like his father and grandfather before him, Jack, as he was
always known, grew up in Earl Shilton but unlike his predecessors, started
a working life in the hosiery and dying industry at Hinckley. The Social
Institute had a marked influence on the early lives of Charles and Ada’s
sons, partly due to the family taking up residence in the Manager’s
quarters, attached to the building, but mostly by their acquired skills at
the game of Billiards. There are many instances, recorded in the press, of
their achievements in many local and national competitions. The level of
National Schoolboy Champions put Earl Shilton on the map during the 1920’s
and their legacy and influence extended as far as the 1960’s and 80’s when
Norman Dagley first became World Amateur Billiards Champion and
subsequently twice World Professional Champion. Norman, who was also a
native of Earl Shilton, often recalled his early training sessions at the
‘Stute’ with Jack’s elder brother Reg in particular. It was during the mid
1920’s, just after the Wrights had settled into the ‘Stute’, that the
author’s father, William B Cope, encouraged Reg and Jack in the
intricacies of billiards. A recognised ‘good’ local league player uncle
‘Bill’ soon observed and nurtured the talents of the two brothers and
guided them to their ultimate achievements in the sport. Unfortunately,
like many of his contemporaries, Jack was called away to serve in H.M.
Forces, returning briefly in 1943 to marry and later, after his service,
to join his wife’s family business and to leave the district eventually
continuing the line in Boston, Lincolnshire.
Like all groupings in the towns and village
throughout the country, the clubs and associations of Earl Shilton felt
the effects of the two major ‘world wars’ of 1914-18 and 1939-45. There
are lists of Institute Members who lost their lives in these conflicts,
and, although Earl Shilton did not suffer the ravages of the Second World
War ‘Blitz’, or directly through enemy action, the appearance of the
village changed markedly at this time. Gangs of workmen removed the
wrought iron and decorative metal fences that surrounded many properties
fronting onto the roads and streets. This was part of the ‘War Effort’ at
home and the national salvage campaign to help supply raw materials for
the armed forces. The war left a permanent change to the appearance of the
village and, following victory; the gradually increased use of private
motor cars played its part. The old yards with small dwellings built in
square terraces had to give way to detached houses, many with garage
space, built in side streets and estates away from the main roads and
thoroughfares.
The ladies and young girls were also called upon to
play their part in the war effort. It was quickly realised that everyone
was needed to contribute, the woman, including cousins Marjorie Wright and
Laurie Pegg were given the choice of entering the armed forces or joining
the legions required in the munitions industries. Had they been married,
they would have had the extra alternative of taking over their husband's
job. Marjorie has recalled for the author how Laurie, then living at the
author's home in Earl Shilton, would cycle to the Institute, leaving her
bike at the 'Stute' before catching the 6.00am 'bus with her. They, and
the one hundred or so others from this area, would then make the one-hour
journey to Bagington, in Coventry, to the aircraft factories. She also
recalls some of the aircraft they helped to build, Whitley, Lincoln and,
perhaps the more readily remembered bomber, the Lancaster. The cousins can
also recall the radio broadcasts made from the factory canteens and taking
part in 'Workers Playtime' and similar programmes, transmitted nationally
to help boost war-time moral.
Perhaps the Wright’s time in Earl Shilton is of
little significance, but the inter-action of the family members, past and
present, undoubtedly plays its part, along with other families, in the way
the village develops and appears to future residents. As indicated
earlier, with Jack's departure to Lincolnshire the Wright line is now
extinct in Earl Shilton. However, the families of the many collateral
lines continue to develop and flourish, with many remaining in Earl
Shilton, and it is they that now represent the extended family originated
by Thomas and Alice at the beginning of the nineteenth century.